Be afraid, be very afraid of what you wish for. 
Ok, perhaps a little melodramatic, but seriously, as the economy begins to pick up so will the inevitable hiring. This is where caution needs to be exercised. I see planning taking place in all industries and in all different sizes of companies. This planning is turning executives into “wide-eyed-Christmas-morning-children” just thinking about the level and sheer number of top-grade sales talent presently in the job pool.
The fallout of the economic recession left extremely talented sales professionals in one of several states of flux. Either currently out of work, doing less-than-their-potential, or covertly looking for the next position. Either way, senior sales people are out there. The rub is, companies are looking to acquire this talent, yet they do not have the “infrastructure” to support this level of talent. The opportunity to obtain this talent has never been better, and quite possibly will we never see this plethora of talent sitting idle again.
Sales managers coming out of regular or special planning sessions need to understand how extraordinary this level of talent is and how to quickly adjust to accommodate them. If you made the commitment to raise the level of sales standard in your company by hiring the upper echelon, then you need to understand the following basics:
- What makes them different
- What motivates them
- How to interact with them
Understand that personalities at this level are mostly of the “A” type and nothing should be done to counter what works for them. After all, you are looking for the best, right? Doing so could signal an implosion of success and leave you as a manager holding the bag that just exploded and wondering what happened.
Several years ago, I worked for one of the biggest software companies in the world. This company had a HUGE pool of top-level salespeople. Yet, they did not possess the infrastructure to guarantee their salespeople’s success. Why? Because they didn’t understand the complexities of this group, nor what it took to support this level of talent. At the time, most other companies didn’t either; and still do not. The damage this did was to put the mark of “unsuccessfulness” on these people. There were those that were good and did well, but there were a lot more that didn’t fair as well through no fault of their own. They were just as talented. The reason: No Support. The company basically said here’s your territory…go get’em! The lesson learned was a hard one for every software company at the time. The bottom line is they gave sales and market share away and never knew it.
So what does this all mean? The level and number of talented individuals in the labor pool right now is enormous. Not every company needs this level of talent. If yours doesn’t, then don’t drool over something you don’t need. If your company does, this use this list as a starting point for successful onboarding.
- If your company’s culture will not or cannot support these people, then do not hire them until it can.
- Does your sales model support this level of talent?
- lead development
- no overlap of territory
- clearly defined compensation model
- How are you going to measure success level?
These are just a very few considerations you must think about. The biggest and most overlooked is lead generation. 
Let’s face the fact here; these people are going to command $6-figure base salaries. Do you want to pay this kind of salary for someone to cold call or close business? I would hope the latter, but you might be surprised to learn some managers today don’t understand this logic. If you don’t understand this, then you don’t need this level of talent…period!!
If you find this useful, Contact Me or please leave a comment. If you have a Twitter account and found this article useful, it would be much appreciated if you would retweet this at the beginning of the article!
Happy Selling!
Ed Warner
You have two candidates interviewing for the same position, and their performance at their last position employer was 80% and 140% respectfully. Which one do you hire? Managers with myopic vision hire the over-quota performer and six months later, you find this person truly is a rock star, but with one BIG drawback. He/she does not follow the rules, disrupts team continuity and has undermined your team allowing resentment to set in which is allowing total sales to drastically fall. WOW! Not the result you had in mind when you hired this cannon is it?
I do caution companies and managers to think sensibly when analyzing the results. These are simply another tool to use in evaluating talent. If you perceive these as the deciding factor, then maybe hiring isn’t your biggest problem.